Platform Pricing

Solutions

Attorneys Clients Paralegals Law Firms Judges

Practice Areas

Family Law Civil Litigation Criminal Defense Immigration Personal Injury Employment Law

Resources

Blog FAQ About Log in Book a demo

For judges

Prepare for every hearing with the complete record.

The bench file arrives as hundreds of unread pages. CaseTime reads all of them — and hands you the cited chronology, the parties mapped, and the contested issues surfaced before you take the bench.

The bench file arrives, but the picture doesn't.

A stack of filings, declarations, exhibits, and motions lands before a hearing. The parties tell you what matters — but each side tells a different story. Someone has to read the full record before the court can weigh any of it, and that someone is you.

CaseTime reads every page first. You start from a cited chronology and an indexed record, with every party identified and every contested issue surfaced — and every answer you need traced to the document and page it came from.

Review the record, not the characterizations.

The full case, prepared for the bench

Everything below is generated from the record itself — and every line cites the document and page it came from.

  • Chronology of facts, claims, orders, and deadlines — cited entry by entry
  • Every filing read, classified, and indexed as it's uploaded
  • Parties, counsel, and relationships mapped across the record
  • Contested issues identified — where the parties diverge
  • Contradictions between filings surfaced with both sources
  • Missing evidence flagged — referenced but never produced
  • Risk flags: procedural gaps, unsupported claims, missing declarations
  • Citation-backed answers to any question about the case
You

What has each side said about the children's school enrollment?

CaseTime

Petitioner's declaration states the children have attended Lincoln Elementary since 2022 DEC 03, p. 4. Respondent's response claims enrollment was changed to Washington Academy without consent in January 2025 RSP 01, p. 7. The school records filed as Exhibit 8 confirm enrollment at Washington Academy effective Jan 6, 2025 EX 08, p. 1.

Hearing preparation 3 sources
DEC 03Petitioner's Declaration, Oct 2024Cited
RSP 01Respondent's Response, Feb 2025Cited
EX 08School enrollment records, Jan 2025Cited

Where judges put CaseTime to work

01

Pre-hearing review

Open the bench file with the chronology, parties, and issues already assembled. Know the posture and the disputes before the first argument.

02

Bench memo preparation

The factual foundation for a bench memo — the events, the orders, the exhibits, the contradictions — cited and organized from the record.

03

Evidence reconciliation

When counsel cite exhibits, verify them instantly — see what the exhibit actually says, what else is in it, and whether it supports the characterization.

04

Issue identification

CaseTime surfaces where the parties' factual assertions diverge — contested facts, conflicting declarations, and unsupported claims.

05

Ruling preparation

After hearing, review the full factual record with pin cites. Every event, order, and statement organized and traceable — no re-reading the stack.

06

Procedural compliance

Has service been completed? Are declarations properly noticed? Is required discovery exchanged? The record answers — with citations.

07

Multi-party case management

Track who's who across complex cases — parties, attorneys, witnesses, experts — with every mention traced to its source in the filings.

08

Post-hearing follow-up

After a hearing, add new filings and the record updates automatically. The chronology, issues, and flags stay current through every stage of the case.

Built for judicial review

Verifiable, not advisory. Every answer cites the record.

CaseTime is case intelligence, not legal analysis. It reads, organizes, and cites the record — it never suggests rulings, applies legal standards, or drafts orders. Every statement is labeled fact, claim, court order, or AI observation. When the record is silent, CaseTime says so. The court's judgment remains the court's alone.

Questions judges ask

Does CaseTime help a judge prepare for trial?

Yes. Upload the case file — filings, motions, declarations, exhibits, orders — and CaseTime builds a cited chronology, maps every party and attorney, identifies contested issues, and surfaces gaps in the record. You walk into the courtroom having read everything, with every answer traceable to a document and page.

Can I review all filings and evidence before a hearing?

That's the core use case. CaseTime reads and classifies every document as it's uploaded — petitions, responses, declarations, exhibits, financial disclosures. Ask any question and the answer cites the specific filing and page. No searching through folders or relying on counsel's characterization of the record.

Does CaseTime suggest rulings or provide legal analysis?

No. CaseTime is case intelligence, not legal analysis. It reads, organizes, and cites the record. Every statement is labeled fact, claim, court order, or AI observation. It never recommends outcomes, drafts orders, or applies legal standards — those remain entirely with the court.

How is judicial confidentiality maintained?

All data is encrypted in transit and at rest. Each matter is isolated — visible only to the people explicitly given access. Data is never sold, shared with third parties, or used to train AI models. A judge's case review is private to that judge. See our privacy policy.

What does CaseTime cost?

$250 per matter, one flat fee, with a 30-day free trial and 25GB of storage included. For court-wide adoption and volume pricing, book a demo.

See a case file fully read.

Bring a closed case to the demo. We'll show you what CaseTime finds in it.

FREE 30-DAY TRIAL · $250 PER MATTER · EVERY ANSWER CITED